Gary Foo’s Five Categories of Missing and Lost Persons
Developed and taught by Gary Foo before first publication in Emergency Response and Search & Rescue: An Operational Book (2009). Revised second edition: 2012, pages 191–202 and being updated in the 2027 3rd edition.
Have you ever separated from a family member in a shop and spent several minutes looking for them? You know what they look like, what they are wearing and where you last saw them. Finding them can still take time.
Now consider the same uncertainty across a town, a river system or the damaged buildings after a disaster. Understanding how someone became missing helps responders consider where they may be, what evidence matters and how to approach the search. Time, weather and movement can change both the search area and the available clues.
“Missing person” describes a report, but does not explain the circumstances of disappearance. Terms matter for professionals.
Gary Foo’s framework identifies five operational categories to help structure that first assessment. They are working hypotheses to investigate and revise as information develops.
A person who is disoriented or unable to find their way back and would ordinarily welcome assistance. Their movement may reflect attempts to regain orientation, reach a familiar place or find help.
Initial question: Where might they go while trying to find their way?
Within this framework, this category describes a person who may have deliberately left or broken expected contact. Their circumstances, intentions, vulnerability and possible destinations require consideration.
Initial question: What choices, contacts or destinations may explain their absence?
A person who may have been removed, controlled or prevented from returning by someone else against their will. The actions of a third party may determine the subject’s location and ability to communicate.
Initial question: What evidence indicates third-party involvement or control?
A person displaced beyond their control by physical forces or an event, such as floodwater, currents, structural collapse or impact. Understanding the mechanism and path of displacement becomes part of the search problem.
Initial question: Where could those forces have carried, displaced or trapped them?
A person who is absent from where others expect them but may not recognize that they are considered missing. This may occur with cognitive impairment, including some presentations of dementia. Individual routines, abilities and familiar destinations remain important.
Initial question: What routine, familiar place or environmental feature might guide this individual?
These categories may overlap and change as evidence develops.
“Missing person” remains the general reporting term; “Missing” above is its narrower use within this framework. “Absent” does not indicate low risk or reduced urgency. Professionals and Specialists like Emergency Services and SAR Team members know that terms matter. Circumstances and profile matters. Lost Person Behaviour matters.
This page introduces the five categories for those who may not be fully aware. As the create of the added categories and the training program you can complete our training.
Please contact us to discuss the full training programme, practical application, programme certification and departmental licensing options for police services, search teams and emergency responders.
For more information and to get certified, contact us
ERTSAR / Advanced Rescue by DIMERSAR for Training enquiries: HQ@ert-sar.com and Office@AdvancedRescue.ca
The category is one part of the operational picture. Effective planning also considers the subject’s individual profile, including their health, cognition, mobility, experience, routines and circumstances.
Detectability asks a different question: if the person is within the area being searched, how likely are responders to notice them? Concealment, visibility, clothing, debris and the ability or willingness to respond can all affect detection.
Earlier research examines the varied circumstances of going missing (Payne, 1995; Biehal, Mitchell and Wade, 2003). Koester’s Lost Person Behavior (2008) provides incident-based subject profiles relevant to search planning. Foo’s framework brings attention to the mechanism of disappearance alongside those individual characteristics.
Police missing-person response: Disorientation, deliberate departure and third-party removal raise different investigative questions and search priorities.
Flood response: A person displaced by moving water presents a different search problem from someone who walked away. The path of the water and potential stopping points become relevant to the operational picture.
Urban search and rescue: Following collapse, responders must consider who evacuated, who may remain inside and who may have been trapped or displaced. The framework complements established USAR assessment and search methods.
Many searches do not result in a find or rescue. Many rescues begin with a known casualty location and require no initial search.
Gary Foo, ECFO, CEMC, MCPara, FInstLM, FCollT, is an emergency services professional, leader, educator and author with more than four decades of experience across policing, fire and technical rescue, paramedicine, search and rescue, disaster response and incident management. A former sworn police officer in the United Kingdom and Canada, he is a serving Fire Chief and Fire Commissioner and disaster Paramedics. His experience includes international operational response with coordination by the UN in the INSARAG framework and emergency services capacity building and training.
Foo, G. (2009; revised 2012). Emergency Response and Search & Rescue: An Operational Book. Second edition, pp. 191–202. ISBN 978-0-9563988-5-7. Original source of the five-category framework.
Payne, M. (1995). Understanding “Going Missing”: Issues for Social Work and Social Services. British Journal of Social Work, 25(3), 333–348. Read more
Biehal, N., Mitchell, F., & Wade, J. (2003). Lost from View: Missing Persons in the UK. Policy Press. Publication record
Koester, R. J. (2008). Lost Person Behavior: A Search and Rescue Guide on Where to Look for Land, Air, and Water. dbS Productions. Subject profiles
Ferguson, L., & Gaub, J. E. (2023). Training police search and rescue teams: Implications for missing persons work. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 23(3), 431–449. Read the article
INSARAG (2020). INSARAG Guidelines. View guidelines
These references provide research and operational context. They do not constitute validation of the five-category framework or a measured improvement in find rates.
Framework and original published work © Gary Foo.